- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:52:33 +0200
- To: David Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: Multilingual Web LT Public List <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2012 11:53:02 UTC
I have a strong preference for ITS 2.0. The fact that there is a bigger scope doesn't count for me. Take the case of XML: it is called a "markup language", although many e.g. service oriented applications don't have to do with markup at all. Also, we are chartered to produce the successor of ITS - not calling this "ITS 2.0" will lead to confusion. Felix Am 19. April 2012 11:42 schrieb David Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>: > As discussed in the last TC, as we increasingly advertise the work of our > group, it becomes more important that we decide what we call it. > > Possible option are: > 'ITS 2.0' > pros: established brand > cons: focus on internationalisation whereas the delta is more related to > localisation and even publication > > 'MLW-LT': > pros: matches name of the group > cons: perhaps not very descriptive of a standard > > Other options might be to extend the ITS brand to encompass the stronger > localisation, e.g > - Localisation and Internationalisation Tag Set (LITS)? > > What are you opinions? Any other suggestions? > > Regards, > Dave > > > -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2012 11:53:02 UTC