Re: [terminology resource] expand this category?

I'd support the idea of having a "languageResource" category. In terms of
format I understand the need for standardisation here, but we need to be
aware that it is far more common for people to use TMX,XLIFF,TBX etc.
rather than a MIME type, so having the "other" option should cover this.

languageResource should also allow for a list (it may already), as the
process may be instructed to use multiple specified language resources e.g.
a specific termbank plus a specific corpus etc.


Declan


On 13 April 2012 15:30, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote:

> > Yes, I think that would be wise, although I
> > suppose we would need an "other" option for those
> > things we don't anticipate, like someone wanting
> > to use "EBCDIC-encoded guillemot-delimited
> > bilingual glossary" ;-)
>
> Then they can register a MIME type for that :)
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2048#section-2.1.2
>
> cheers,
> -ys
>
>
>


-- 
Dr. Declan Groves
Research Integration Officer
Centre for Next Generation Localisation (CNGL)
Dublin City University

email: dgroves@computing.dcu.ie <dgroves@computing.dcu.ie>
 phone: +353 (0)1 700 6906