Re: MLW-LT Data categorie > process state

Hi Pedro,

Based on your response and Mo's, I have added this item to the relevant pages. Feel free to edit and to fill in the work package information as well.

Best,

Arle

Sic scripsit Pedro L. Díez Orzas in Apr 5, 2012 ad 15:30 :

> Dear all,
>  
> Thank you very much Moritz. Our opinion is that this should be included because this is included in the scope, since the 3 main goals of LT-Web are:
>  
> (http://cordis.europa.eu/projects/rcn/101839_en.html):
> The goal of LT-Web is to set the foundation for the integration of language technologies into core Web technologies, via the creation of a standard defining three kinds of metadata about: 1) information in Web content being relevant for language technology processing; 2) processes for creating Web content via localisation and content management work flows; 3) language technology applications and resources used in these applications. The organizations participating in LT-Web will join the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and create a group defining the metadata standard, within the Internationalization Activity of W3C.
>  
> We think that the “process state” or “process trigger” responds to the 2nd goal: 2) processes for creating Web content via localisation and content management work flows. Also, we think this is one of the most interensting part for part of the implementations of WP3. We also consider that the data model we proposed do not contain really fine-grained process info, but only the basic info to widely define any localisation process (concerning workflows, for intance: processRequested –value: code or plain text (e.g. an action or workflow name)).
>  
> Best,
> Pedro