Re: [ACTION-50]: Explain process triggers in more detail

Hi Arle, all,
That was the nascent definition section i put in an earlier version of 
the requirements document, you probably just put that there for safe 
keeping.

Though some general definition are useful, this could become a bit 
unbounded, so i suggest we focus on providing working definitions for 
the processes that you, Arle, have suggested in the table at:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Av8I1YVQlYmsdElxU0g3cXlfaTZZRVpSOFl4UlczcFE&output=html

This way we will keep definitions tightly linked to the requirements 
gathering process - I've made a start with this on the definitions page.

cheers,
Dave


On 16/04/2012 14:29, Arle Lommel wrote:
> Actually we have started a list of defined terms:
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Definitions
>
> But it needs a /lot/ of work…
>
> (Apparently I made the page, but I have no recollection of it, which 
> tells you how much work went into it…)
>
> -Arle
>
> Sic scripsit Yves Savourel in Apr 16, 2012 ad 15:01 :
>
>> Hi Pedro,
>> I think the list for processRequested looks like a very good progress.
>> It’s more and better than what I was thinking about.
>> I’m guessing we’ll probably have to define some of the terms we use 
>> (like what exactly ‘localization’ means in this context) just so 
>> everyone talks about the same thing. But that’s probably something 
>> for the specification overall: I don’t think we’ve started a list of 
>> defined terms.
>> Cheers,
>> -ys