Re: [ACTION-50]: Explain process triggers in more detail

Thanks Dave, for the explanation and the work on this. I had looked at the page and wondered who made it and found my name there. It must have been as you suggest: I copied it out and put it there. If you made it and I simply pasted it, then more work went into it than I thought: I guessed I'd done it and completely forgotten it.)

-Arle


Sic scripsit Dave Lewis in Apr 16, 2012 ad 16:12 :

> Hi Arle, all,
> That was the nascent definition section i put in an earlier version of the requirements document, you probably just put that there for safe keeping.
> 
> Though some general definition are useful, this could become a bit unbounded, so i suggest we focus on providing working definitions for the processes that you, Arle, have suggested in the table at:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Av8I1YVQlYmsdElxU0g3cXlfaTZZRVpSOFl4UlczcFE&output=html
> 
> This way we will keep definitions tightly linked to the requirements gathering process - I've made a start with this on the definitions page.
> 
> cheers,
> Dave
> 
>  
> On 16/04/2012 14:29, Arle Lommel wrote:
>> 
>> Actually we have started a list of defined terms:
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Definitions
>> 
>> But it needs a lot of work…
>> 
>> (Apparently I made the page, but I have no recollection of it, which tells you how much work went into it…)
>> 
>> -Arle
>> 
>> Sic scripsit Yves Savourel in Apr 16, 2012 ad 15:01 :
>> 
>>> Hi Pedro,
>>>  
>>> I think the list for processRequested looks like a very good progress.
>>> It’s more and better than what I was thinking about.
>>>  
>>> I’m guessing we’ll probably have to define some of the terms we use (like what exactly ‘localization’ means in this context) just so everyone talks about the same thing. But that’s probably something for the specification overall: I don’t think we’ve started a list of defined terms.
>>>  
>>> Cheers,
>>> -ys
>