public-annotation@w3.org from August 2016 by date

Wednesday, 31 August 2016

• RE: testdev repository Timothy Cole
• Re: Question about annotation IDs Randall Leeds
• Re: Question about annotation IDs Shane McCarron
• Re: Question about annotation IDs Ivan Herman
• Question about annotation IDs Shane McCarron

Tuesday, 30 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] Exit criteria Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Exit criteria BigBlueHat via GitHub

Monday, 29 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed gsergiu via GitHub

Friday, 26 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed r12a via GitHub
• testdev repository Shane McCarron
• Meeting minutes, 2016-08-26 Ivan Herman
• Re: Web Anno Agenda: Telco: 2016-08-26 Ben De Meester
• Re: If-Match and Weak ETags Ivan Herman
• Changes to wptreport to improve the output Shane McCarron

Thursday, 25 August 2016

• Web Anno Agenda: Telco: 2016-08-26 Timothy Cole
• Re: FW: [w3c/web-platform-tests] Annotation model first real tests (#3509) Shane McCarron

Wednesday, 24 August 2016

• RE: If-Match and Weak ETags Benjamin Young
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Kevin Marks via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] ed sugg: textDirection r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] ed sugg: textDirection BigBlueHat via GitHub
• FW: [w3c/web-platform-tests] Annotation model first real tests (#3509) Timothy Cole
• Re: [web-annotation] processLanguage description improvement suggestion gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Processing language for mono-lingual and internationalized resources gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Processing language for multilingual resources gsergiu via GitHub

Tuesday, 23 August 2016

• Closed: [web-annotation] Requirements for Agents Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Requirements for Agents Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] TextPositionSelector, thoughts about Unicode code *point* vs. UTF16 code *unit* Daniel Weck via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Avoid mixed-content error with JSON-LD context in HTTPS Sarven Capadisli via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Avoid mixed-content error with JSON-LD context in HTTPS Sarven Capadisli via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] ed sugg: textDirection Takeshi Kanai via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] TextPositionSelector, thoughts about Unicode code *point* vs. UTF16 code *unit* Takeshi Kanai via GitHub

Monday, 22 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] TextPositionSelector, thoughts about Unicode code *point* vs. UTF16 code *unit* Daniel Weck via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] TextPositionSelector, thoughts about Unicode code *point* vs. UTF16 code *unit* Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] TextPositionSelector, thoughts about Unicode code *point* vs. UTF16 code *unit* Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] TextPositionSelector, thoughts about Unicode code *point* vs. UTF16 code *unit* Ivan Herman via GitHub
• [web-annotation] TextPositionSelector, thoughts about Unicode code *point* vs. UTF16 code *unit* Daniel Weck via GitHub
• Re: If-Match and Weak ETags Ivan Herman

Sunday, 21 August 2016

• Fwd: If-Match and Weak ETags Robert Sanderson

Friday, 19 August 2016

• Tests pushed Shane McCarron
• Minutes of meeting 2016-08-19 Ivan Herman
• Re: [web-annotation] ed sugg: textDirection r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Requirements for Agents Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] ed sugg: textDirection Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Requirements for Agents BigBlueHat via GitHub
• RE: Annotation Model - Testing Annotation Keys Cole, Timothy W
• Re: Annotation Model - Testing Annotation Keys Shane McCarron
• Re: Web Anno Agenda: Telco: 2016-08-19 Paolo Ciccarese
• Annotation Model - Testing Annotation Keys Cole, Timothy W

Thursday, 18 August 2016

• Re: Making the annotation tests more informative Shane McCarron
• Re: Making the annotation tests more informative Shane McCarron
• Web Anno Agenda: Telco: 2016-08-19 Timothy Cole
• Re: Making the annotation tests more informative Shane McCarron
• RE: Making the annotation tests more informative Cole, Timothy W

Wednesday, 17 August 2016

• RE: Making the annotation tests more informative Timothy Cole
• Re: [web-annotation] Requirements for Agents Tim Cole via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] ed sugg: textDirection Lina Kemmel via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Requirements for Agents Ivan Herman via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Requirements for Agents Rob Sanderson via GitHub

Tuesday, 16 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] ed sugg: textDirection matial via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Avoid mixed-content error with JSON-LD context in HTTPS BigBlueHat via GitHub
• [web-annotation] ed sugg: textDirection r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Processing language for mono-lingual and internationalized resources r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Avoid mixed-content error with JSON-LD context in HTTPS BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Avoid mixed-content error with JSON-LD context in HTTPS Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Avoid mixed-content error with JSON-LD context in HTTPS Sarven Capadisli via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Protocol examples should use comma separated headers in examples Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Container Representations section should be more demanding Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Protocol Paging content editorial restructuring Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Avoid mixed-content error with JSON-LD context in HTTPS Rob Sanderson via GitHub

Friday, 12 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] processLanguage description improvement suggestion aphillips via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] processLanguage description improvement suggestion r12a via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Avoid mixed-content error with JSON-LD context Sarven Capadisli via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] processLanguage description improvement suggestion aphillips via GitHub
• Making the annotation tests more informative Shane McCarron
• Re: Agenda: Telco 2016-08-12 TB Dinesh
• Meeting minutes, 2016-08-12 Ivan Herman
• [web-annotation] Add info about which Media Type to Model BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Processing language for multilingual resources Andreas Kuckartz via GitHub
• Agenda: Telco 2016-08-12 Robert Sanderson
• RE: annotation data model -- running test scripts Timothy Cole
• Re: annotation data model -- running test scripts Shane McCarron
• Re: annotation data model -- running test scripts Shane McCarron
• Re: [web-annotation] processLanguage description improvement suggestion gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between dc:language and processing language for multilingual resources gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between dc:language and processing language for multilingual resources r12a via GitHub
• [web-annotation] processLanguage description improvement suggestion r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between dc:language and processing language for multilingual resources gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between dc:language and processing language for multilingual resources r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between dc:language and processing language for multilingual resources gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between dc:language and processing language for multilingual resources r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Processing language for multilingual resources gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between dc:language and processing language for multilingual resources gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between dc:language and processing language for multilingual resources Felix Sasaki via GitHub
• RE: annotation data model -- running test scripts Cole, Timothy W

Thursday, 11 August 2016

• Re: annotation data model -- running test scripts Shane McCarron
• Re: [web-annotation] Legal IRI for Annotation Containers Shane McCarron via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Legal IRI for Annotation Containers Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Legal IRI for Annotation Containers Shane McCarron via GitHub
• annotation data model -- running test scripts Timothy Cole
• Re: [web-annotation] Legal IRI for Annotation Containers Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between dc:language and processing language for multilingual resources Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Processing language for multilingual resources Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Legal IRI for Annotation Containers BigBlueHat via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Legal IRI for Annotation Containers Shane McCarron via GitHub

Tuesday, 9 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between dc:language and processing language for multilingual resources gsergiu via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Relationship between dc:language and processing language for multilingual resources gsergiu via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Processing language for mono-lingual and internationalized resources gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? gsergiu via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Processing language for multilingual resources gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Replace textDirection property with recommendation for including control characters in the text Tomer Mahlin via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? Andreas Kuckartz via GitHub

Monday, 8 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Ivan Herman via GitHub

Sunday, 7 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Shane McCarron via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Tantek Çelik via GitHub

Saturday, 6 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Ivan Herman via GitHub

Friday, 5 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] Fix 333 multiple http headers BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Tantek Çelik via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Clarify scope of the key 'purpose' in Section 3.3.5 Tim Cole via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Replace textDirection property with recommendation for including control characters in the text Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Replace textDirection property with recommendation for including control characters in the text Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Minutes of meeting, 2016-08-05 Ivan Herman
• [web-annotation] Clarify principle that features of external resources are not authoritative Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Fix 333 multiple http headers BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Replace textDirection property with recommendation for including control characters in the text gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Replace textDirection property with recommendation for including control characters in the text BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? Takeshi Kanai via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Replace textDirection property with recommendation for including control characters in the text gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed gsergiu via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed gsergiu via GitHub

Thursday, 4 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Kevin Marks via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Replace textDirection property with recommendation for including control characters in the text Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Aaron Parecki via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Ivan Herman via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Replace textDirection property with recommendation for including control characters in the text Aaron Parecki via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Tantek Çelik via GitHub
• Agenda: Telco 2016-08-05 Robert Sanderson
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Next/Prev are untestable gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed gsergiu via GitHub

Wednesday, 3 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Tantek Çelik via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Aaron Parecki via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Next/Prev are untestable Shane McCarron via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Jacob via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Next/Prev are untestable gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] How do we model "groups" in the Annotation model? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed gsergiu via GitHub

Tuesday, 2 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed aphillips via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Shane McCarron via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Tantek Çelik via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Aaron Parecki via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Kevin Marks via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Shane McCarron via GitHub
• [web-annotation] The textDirection and processingLanguage properties are not needed Kevin Marks via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Protocol examples should use comma separated headers in examples BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Protocol examples should use comma separated headers in examples BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Protocol examples should use comma separated headers in examples BigBlueHat via GitHub

Monday, 1 August 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] Protocol examples should use comma separated headers in examples Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] MUST ETag on GET, but only SHOULD If-Match on PUT and DELETE Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] MUST ETag on GET, but only SHOULD If-Match on PUT and DELETE BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: progress on schemas for model testing Shane McCarron
• Re: progress on schemas for model testing Ivan Herman

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 August 2016 23:02:03 UTC