- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 21:24:09 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
there is no proper solution for this problem as the current definition of the processing language is trying to solve with one field more purposes. In this ticket I just tried to demonstrate that the cardinality 1 for the processing languge is a wrong solution. Also ... it is wrong to mix the concepts of presentation language and processing language.... as they have practice, often conflicting values. -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/337#issuecomment-238382266 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 8 August 2016 21:24:27 UTC