Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage?

there is no proper solution for this problem as the current definition
 of the processing language is trying to solve with one field more 
In this ticket I just tried to demonstrate that the cardinality 1 for 
the processing languge is a wrong solution. Also ... it is wrong to 
mix the concepts of presentation language and processing language.... 
as they have practice, often conflicting values.

GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu
Please view or discuss this issue at
 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 8 August 2016 21:24:27 UTC