- From: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:37:38 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
This is (essentially) the difference between Strong and Weak ETags: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_ETag#Strong_and_weak_validation LDP simply requires ETags and doesn't make any statement about strong vs weak. My preference is for weak, as changing the ETag for every different representation makes it useless. The _resource_ hasn't changed, even if a different _representation_ of the resource has been requested. The Content-Location header should be sufficient for caching (but would love to hear practical experience of that), though it would be good to put Prefer into Vary. And the same applies to both container/collection and annotation representations. -- GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/327#issuecomment-236742341 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 1 August 2016 23:37:46 UTC