Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage?

@tkanai 
You are perfectly right, that the meaning and expected behaviour given
 by dc:language should be also clarified, and the meaning of the 
dc:language probably needs to be adapted for embedded text, and for 
external resources.
1. for the embedded text, we know that this is UTF-8/16/32, and we 
need to see what else is needed for correct representation. (one 
proposed solution is to split the text in more bodies , another is to 
use html formating)
2. For external resources, the dc:language actually should have no 
influence on representation, it should be only used for search and 
(nlp) processing purposes.

see also: 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/335#issuecomment-237790411
  

 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/337#issuecomment-237812816
 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 5 August 2016 10:06:00 UTC