- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:56:25 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@r12a with all teh respect the current version of the draft says something different. Even if in particular cases it is the same thing, in general it is not! (Additionality the natural language of multi-lingual texts is the set of used languages (i.e. language).. in my opinion) `The language to use for text processing algorithms such as line breaking, hyphenation, which font to use, and similar. ` Given the definition above ... the question is valid, what should a server implementation do if the processingLanguage is not the one of the processor, but the processor could technically still process the text. Is the processing vorbidden? -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/343#issuecomment-239407702 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 12 August 2016 09:56:33 UTC