- From: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 17:25:51 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
If some people need it, then as @BigBlueHat said, this issue can be closed -- the claim is that they are /not/ needed. If we were to **remove** them, that would not be just an editorial change, it would be a normative one (hence @tantek's question about whether they're marked at-risk, given that we're in CR). If the solution is to provide a better explanation, that is just an editorial issue that we can take care of before the PR phase. My request for a proposal as to a solution is because I want folks who claim the documentation is insufficient to not just complain, but actually come up with something better :smile: "I don't like the way you wrote that" is just not helpful at this stage. -- GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/335#issuecomment-237623124 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2016 17:26:02 UTC