- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 07:33:52 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
This implies to define processing classes, yes, however it was not requested that the standard. in #309 was proposed the usage of a primer document with practical guidelines for implementation. I was simply proposing the correct structure which is perfectly alingned with the motivation and explanations provided by @r12a and @fsasaki which ended up whith the introduction of this processingLanguage. As it is obvious and recognized in #335 the current definition of the processingLanguage and the information carried by this field is incomplete. I really don't understand ... why again the decision to close this ticket without discussing it with the stakeholders. -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/341#issuecomment-239380474 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 12 August 2016 07:34:00 UTC