- From: BigBlueHat via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 14:53:24 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
So I had this wonderful proposal for fixing this, but just found that it looks like LDP just provides multiple `include` values as space delimited IRIs: From: https://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#prefer-examples-direct-membershiponly ``` Clients interested only in information about the container (for example, which membership predicate it uses) and its membership might use this hint on a GET request: Prefer: return=representation; include="http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#PreferMembership http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#PreferMinimalContainer". ``` [`include` is not (as yet) a registered preference](http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-parameters/http-parameters.xhtml#preferences), so perhaps we'll need more information added to my note commit that explains its usage. And perhaps we should help LDP (or whoever) get `include` registered. Thoughts? -- GitHub Notification of comment by BigBlueHat Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/333#issuecomment-236929735 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2016 14:53:34 UTC