Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage?

and .. thank you for the good example for the "language" problem. This
 is very good to take it as concrete input and to annalize what is 
needed for correct representation. 
1. If .. the provided webpage is used as external resource, ... it is 
clear than the language needs to be included in the html code, for 
correct representation, and not in the annotation. (as I said above, 
the list of used dc:languages can be used for search/filtering 
purposes, but not for correct rendering )
2. The example you provided could be also used as embedded text ... 
which is probably best to be formated as html, however ... a pure json
 based API might not like to embedd html but would like to split the 
text in multiple bodies .. so that a 1 tp 1 text-language asignment is
 possible.
(In fact ... this is what the i18n reviewers tried to explain ... 
without having a deep understanding of the WA model) 


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/337#issuecomment-237815324
 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 5 August 2016 10:16:37 UTC