- From: r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:00:23 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@gsergiu if i understand your intent correctly, i think the answer to your last comment may be that the processingLanguage value is intended, as you say, to simply indicate the actual language of the text that it is associated with. If you want to indicate what processes were run on the string text, that's a different thing altogether. Getting back to the original question posed in this issue, i assume that when you refer to dc:language you mean the Language property, in contrast to the processingLanguage property. The only situation i can think of where the processingLanguage would not be the same as or one of the languages in the Language property would be where one value was more carefully specified than the other, which seems an odd case anyway. I don't suppose there's any problem with adding a non-normative note of the kind you mention. It may produce better results in a few circumstances, but wouldn't do any harm afaict. -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12a Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/343#issuecomment-239396388 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 12 August 2016 09:00:30 UTC