- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 07:24:21 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
well ... I think that there are, only that we didn't make an analysis deep enough of these usecases. as indicated in #341 there are different types of processors, and this property was introduced exactly becasue the processors need it, not becasue the annotation, or the represenation of the annotation needs it. So ... there are classes of processors that need the exact language of the text, mainly the ones that deal with rendering. And there are classes that don't need the exact representation, like the indexers or entity recognition tools. The most of indexers and ER tools are trained on english texts, so .. their processing language should be en, but they can be successfully applied on resources in other languages (e.g. german, french, italian, romanian). Therefore it is very important to think types/classes of text processors could be used, and what is the implication of using the processingLanguage of cardinality 1, given the the correct representation would be the one proposed in #341 -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/343#issuecomment-239378915 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 12 August 2016 07:24:31 UTC