- From: BigBlueHat via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:28:00 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
I'd prefer client implementers (and/or their underlying libraries) do their own preference handling when it comes to (in)secure requests. The name we use should remain unchanged and "http://" is the more flexible/"upgrade-able" of the two protocol schemes, so using that one seems prudent for longevity. -- GitHub Notification of comment by BigBlueHat Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/347#issuecomment-240118895 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2016 14:28:07 UTC