Re: [web-annotation] Cardinality of the processingLanguage?

80% of the time it's not needed, as dc:language will do.
10% of the time it is necessary.
10% of the time it is not sufficient, and there isn't anything else 
that would work better.

So ... you can have 80% of the cases covered, or 90% of the cases 
covered.  We choose to have 90% of the cases covered by adding a 
completely optional property, for hopefully obvious reasons.  So it's 
not that we "choose not to fix" it, it's that there __isn't a 

As you STILL have not proposed ANY solution despite being asked many 
times, I'm closing the issue.

GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42
Please view or discuss this issue at
 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 8 August 2016 21:18:03 UTC