ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2022 by date

Thursday, 31 March 2022

• Re: Comments on Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP Lucas Pardue
• Re: Comments on Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: Comments on Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP Glenn Strauss
• Re: Comments on Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP Lucas Pardue
• Re: Comments on Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: Proposed HTTP field name registry updates - feedback solicited Roberto Polli
• Re: Comments on Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP Glenn Strauss
• Re: Comments on Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP Lucas Pardue
• Re: Comments on Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP Glenn Strauss
• Re: Comments on Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: Proposed HTTP field name registry updates - feedback solicited Willy Tarreau
• Comments on Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP Glenn Strauss
• Re: Proposed HTTP field name registry updates - feedback solicited Tommy Pauly
• Proposed HTTP field name registry updates - feedback solicited Mark Nottingham

Monday, 28 March 2022

• Re: [Masque] WGLC for draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram David Schinazi
• Re: http-core spec publication soonish Daniel Stenberg
• Re: http-core spec publication soonish Willy Tarreau
• http-core spec publication soonish Julian Reschke

Sunday, 27 March 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Wednesday, 23 March 2022

• Re: An informational+individual RFC for migrating from Digest? Roberto Polli
• Re: [Masque] WGLC for draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram David Schinazi
• Re: [Masque] WGLC for draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram David Schinazi
• Re: [Masque] WGLC for draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram Mark Nottingham
• Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 22 March 2022

• Re: An informational+individual RFC for migrating from Digest? Tommy Pauly
• Re: An informational+individual RFC for migrating from Digest? Mark Nottingham
• Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-16: (with DISCUSS) Francesca Palombini via Datatracker
• An informational+individual RFC for migrating from Digest? Roberto Polli

Monday, 21 March 2022

• WGLC for draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp Eric Kinnear
• WGLC for draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram Christopher Wood
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-08.txt Lucas Pardue
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-08.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6890) Julian Reschke
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6890) RFC Errata System

Sunday, 20 March 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 18 March 2022

• Signature Bikeshedding: Component Name / Component Identifier Justin Richer

Wednesday, 16 March 2022

• Method for Upgrade David Schinazi

Monday, 14 March 2022

• Re: Semantics: clarify handling of invalid or unsatisfiable range requests Julian Reschke

Sunday, 20 February 2022

• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Jeffrey Barber

Sunday, 13 March 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Willy Tarreau

Saturday, 12 March 2022

• Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Lucas Pardue
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Willy Tarreau
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Lucas Pardue
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Willy Tarreau
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Amos Jeffries

Friday, 11 March 2022

• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Ryan Hamilton

Thursday, 10 March 2022

• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Martin Thomson
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Lucas Pardue
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Ben Schwartz
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Lucas Pardue

Wednesday, 9 March 2022

• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Ryan Hamilton
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Martin Thomson
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Lucas Pardue
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Ben Schwartz
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Lucas Pardue
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Ben Schwartz

Monday, 7 March 2022

• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-duke-httpbis-quic-version-alt-svc-00.txt Lucas Pardue

Sunday, 6 March 2022

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-09.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 4 March 2022

• Clarification on RFC6570 Darrel Miller
• Bikeshedding Digest Fields: 30 seconds to vote. The pool is open! Roberto Polli

Thursday, 3 March 2022

• Re: Semantics: clarify handling of invalid or unsatisfiable range requests Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Semantics: clarify handling of invalid or unsatisfiable range requests Eric J Bowman
• Semantics: clarify handling of invalid or unsatisfiable range requests Roy T. Fielding

Tuesday, 1 March 2022

• Bikeshedding Digest Field names Lucas Pardue
• Re: Semantics of absent header field versus header field with empty value Willy Tarreau
• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Michael Toomim

Monday, 28 February 2022

• Re: Semantics of absent header field versus header field with empty value Mark Nottingham
• Semantics of absent header field versus header field with empty value Backman, Annabelle
• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Julian Reschke

Sunday, 27 February 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Saturday, 26 February 2022

• Re: Adoption call for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit Tommy Pauly
• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Michael Toomim
• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Michael Toomim
• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Michael Toomim
• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Michael Toomim

Friday, 25 February 2022

• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Seph Gentle

Thursday, 24 February 2022

• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Kévin Dunglas

Wednesday, 23 February 2022

• Re: updating ECH keys from a web server Stephen Farrell
• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Matthew Kerwin
• Re: updating ECH keys from a web server Martin Thomson
• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Seph Gentle

Tuesday, 22 February 2022

• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Mark Nottingham
• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Kevin Marks
• RE: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Mike Bishop
• Re: Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Kévin Dunglas
• Re: updating ECH keys from a web server Stephen Farrell
• Re: updating ECH keys from a web server Ben Schwartz
• updating ECH keys from a web server Stephen Farrell

Monday, 21 February 2022

• Re: Referencing keywords/eref in kramdown-rfc2629 Mark Nottingham
• Referencing keywords/eref in kramdown-rfc2629 Roberto Polli

Sunday, 20 February 2022

• Mnot's Pub/Sub for the Web Michael Toomim
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Thursday, 17 February 2022

• Re: Editorial styling inconsistencies when referring to Structured Fields Lucas Pardue
• Re: Editorial styling inconsistencies when referring to Structured Fields Roberto Polli
• Signaling absent fields in signatures Justin Richer
• Re: Editorial styling inconsistencies when referring to Structured Fields Lucas Pardue
• Re: Editorial styling inconsistencies when referring to Structured Fields Roberto Polli

Wednesday, 16 February 2022

• Re: Editorial styling inconsistencies when referring to Structured Fields Mark Nottingham
• Re: Editorial styling inconsistencies when referring to Structured Fields Lucas Pardue
• Re: Editorial styling inconsistencies when referring to Structured Fields Mark Nottingham
• Re: Editorial styling inconsistencies when referring to Structured Fields Roberto Polli
• Editorial styling inconsistencies when referring to Structured Fields Lucas Pardue

Monday, 14 February 2022

• AUTH48 for HTTP/3 and QPACK Mike Bishop
• Re: Digest Headers and Structured Fields Lucas Pardue

Wednesday, 9 February 2022

• Re: Adoption call for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit Martin Thomson

Tuesday, 8 February 2022

• Protocol Action: 'Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-04.txt) The IESG
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-04.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Adoption call for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit Lucas Pardue
• Re: Adoption call for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit Justin Richer
• Re: Adoption call for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit Julian Reschke

Monday, 7 February 2022

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-03.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02 Ryan Hamilton
• Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: (with COMMENT) Ryan Hamilton
• Re: Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: (with COMMENT) Ryan Hamilton
• Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: (with COMMENT) Ryan Hamilton
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: (with COMMENT) Ryan Hamilton
• Re: Martin Duke's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: (with COMMENT) Ryan Hamilton
• Re: Adoption call for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Adoption call for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit James
• Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-01 David Schinazi
• Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-01 David Schinazi
• Adoption call for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit Tommy Pauly
• Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-01 Willy Tarreau
• Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-01 Martin Thomson
• Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-01 Mark Nottingham
• Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-01 Willy Tarreau
• Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-01 Willy Tarreau
• Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-01 Willy Tarreau

Sunday, 6 February 2022

• Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-01 Martin Thomson

Saturday, 5 February 2022

• Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-01 Wenbo Zhu

Friday, 4 February 2022

• Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-01 Mark Nottingham
• DRAFT minutes from this week's interim Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 3 February 2022

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: (with COMMENT) Lars Eggert via Datatracker

Wednesday, 2 February 2022

• Re: Digest Headers and Structured Fields Lucas Pardue
• Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: (with COMMENT) Warren Kumari via Datatracker
• Re: Digest Headers and Structured Fields Roberto Polli
• Re: Digest Headers and Structured Fields Lucas Pardue

Tuesday, 1 February 2022

• Re: Digest Headers and Structured Fields Roberto Polli
• Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: (with COMMENT) Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker
• Re: Digest Headers and Structured Fields Lucas Pardue

Monday, 31 January 2022

• Protocol Action: 'HTTP/2' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-07.txt) The IESG
• Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: (with COMMENT) Robert Wilton via Datatracker

Sunday, 30 January 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 29 January 2022

• Reminder: HTTP (httpbis) WG Virtual Meeting: 2022-02-01, 03 Mark Nottingham

Friday, 28 January 2022

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-08.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: (with COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker

Wednesday, 26 January 2022

• Re: Signature Crypto Algorithm Details Justin Richer

Tuesday, 25 January 2022

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-cert-field-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Martin Duke's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke via Datatracker
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-07.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Monday, 24 January 2022

• Protocol Action: 'Targeted HTTP Cache Control' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-04.txt) The IESG
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02 Francesca Palombini
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-04.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 23 January 2022

• Re: Feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-02 Carsten Bormann
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 22 January 2022

• RE: Digest Headers and Structured Fields Justin Richer

Friday, 21 January 2022

• Re: Digest Headers and Structured Fields Julian Reschke
• Digest Headers and Structured Fields Lucas Pardue
• Re: Changes to HTTP/2 from IESG review (and beyond) Willy Tarreau
• Re: Changes to HTTP/2 from IESG review (and beyond) Mark Nottingham
• Changes to HTTP/2 from IESG review (and beyond) Martin Thomson
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 20 January 2022

• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-02 Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-02 Slik, David
• Re: Feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-02 Julian Reschke
• Feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-02 Slik, David
• Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Dynamic table size updates Willy Tarreau
• Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) Warren Kumari via Datatracker

Wednesday, 19 January 2022

• Re: Dynamic table size updates Martin Thomson
• Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02 Tim Bray via Datatracker

Tuesday, 18 January 2022

• Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) Robert Wilton via Datatracker
• Protocol Action: 'Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-12.txt) The IESG
• Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker
• Re: Could someone clarify these sentences in HPACK RFC 7541? Jingcheng Zhang
• Re: Could someone clarify these sentences in HPACK RFC 7541? Martin Thomson
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Could someone clarify these sentences in HPACK RFC 7541? Jingcheng Zhang
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-12.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Monday, 17 January 2022

• Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
• Re: Could someone clarify these sentences in HPACK RFC 7541? Martin Thomson
• Could someone clarify these sentences in HPACK RFC 7541? Jingcheng Zhang

Sunday, 16 January 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 15 January 2022

• Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: [IANA #1218648] expert review for draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control (http-fields) Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 14 January 2022

• Re: Signature Crypto Algorithm Details Brian Campbell
• John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) John Scudder via Datatracker
• Re: Signature Crypto Algorithm Details Tim Bray
• Re: Signature Crypto Algorithm Details Henry Story
• Re: Signature Crypto Algorithm Details Tim Bray
• Signature Crypto Algorithm Details Justin Richer
• Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 13 January 2022

• Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03: (with COMMENT) Éric Vyncke via Datatracker

Wednesday, 12 January 2022

• Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-01 Ryan Hamilton
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Dynamic table size updates Martin Thomson
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-01 Ryan Hamilton

Tuesday, 11 January 2022

• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-01 Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
• [Errata Rejected] RFC7231 (6814) RFC Errata System
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6814) Julian Reschke
• RE: Call for Adoption: draft-bishop-httpbis-origin-h3-00 Mike Bishop
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-bishop-httpbis-origin-h3-00 Martin Thomson
• Call for Adoption: draft-bishop-httpbis-origin-h3-00 Mark Nottingham
• FYI: first go at CDN-Cache-Control tests Mark Nottingham

Monday, 10 January 2022

• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6814) Martin Thomson
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6814) Julian Reschke
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6814) Julian Reschke
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6814) Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6814) Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6814) Julian Reschke
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6814) Julian Reschke
• [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6814) RFC Errata System

Sunday, 9 January 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
• RE: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mike Bishop

Saturday, 8 January 2022

• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk

Friday, 7 January 2022

• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit-02.txt Mark Nottingham
• Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with COMMENT) Martin Thomson
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Martin Thomson
• Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with COMMENT) Martin Thomson
• httpbis - Not having a session at IETF 113 IETF Meeting Session Request Tool

Thursday, 6 January 2022

• Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with COMMENT) Cory Benfield
• Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with COMMENT) Robert Wilton via Datatracker
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-11: (with COMMENT) Kazuho Oku
• Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with COMMENT) Martin Thomson

Wednesday, 5 January 2022

• John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with COMMENT) John Scudder via Datatracker
• Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
• FW: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpapi-linkset-06.txt> (Linkset: Media Types and a Link Relation Type for Link Sets) to Informational RFC Francesca Palombini
• Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-01.txt> (Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3) to Proposed Standard The IESG
• Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with COMMENT) Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
• Re: Dynamic table size updates Stefan Eissing
• Re: Dynamic table size updates Willy Tarreau
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-03.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Dynamic table size updates Martin Thomson
• Dynamic table size updates Martin Thomson
• Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-10 Kazuho Oku
• AD Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-01 Francesca Palombini

Tuesday, 4 January 2022

• Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke via Datatracker

Monday, 3 January 2022

• Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with COMMENT) Martin Thomson
• Re: Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with COMMENT) Martin Thomson
• Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with COMMENT) Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
• HTTP (httpbis) WG Virtual Meeting: 2022-02-03 IESG Secretary
• HTTP (httpbis) WG Virtual Meeting: 2022-02-01 IESG Secretary
• Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-06: (with COMMENT) Lars Eggert via Datatracker

Sunday, 2 January 2022

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2022 18:03:58 UTC