W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2022

Re: Digest Headers and Structured Fields

From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 09:49:57 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oYA0TzkUdudFyw5ZOg4yHG8aCJ5+PHLGi+cdKYaOHX15Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Folks,

Thanks for the engaged discussion during the Interim yesterday. Based on
the feeling in the room, and some of my editorial judgment, I've prepared a
new pull request that sits somewhere between option 2 and 3. It also
borrows some of the ideas given in the chat to overcome the technical
challenges I mentioned towards the end of the presentation. Please see
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1919, which includes a
summary of things.

I might be overlooking what people want to see wrt text treatment of RFC
3230 obsoletion. I don't think there's much to say personally. But I'm
happy to take on board feedback in this area.

I didn't address the bikeshed of field names either. A comment was made
about name lengths, which I agree with. In the interest of focus, I think
we should pursue that on a separate ticket and resolve that before we
publish draft 08.


On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 6:41 PM Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Lucas!
> Folks, see you later!
> R
> Il mar 1 feb 2022, 15:18 Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>> Thanks for feedback so far. I'll be presenting the different options at
>> the HTTP Interim meeting session in a few hours. The slides might give a
>> bit more insight in case anyone wants to do some preparation: see
>> https://github.com/httpwg/wg-materials/blob/gh-pages/interim-22-02/digests.pdf
>> Cheers,
>> Lucas
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2022 09:50:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:44:07 UTC