- From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 11:25:32 +1100
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Just a follow-up to this. We've had a few more eyeballs on the text and I think we're all happy with all the grammar. Anyone who hasn't looked yet, see https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/1005 Chairs, where do we stand? On Wed, Jan 5, 2022, at 16:51, Martin Thomson wrote: > Hey folks, > > We've had a bunch of discussion about the interpretation of RFC 7540 > and 7541 regarding updates to the HPACK header table size limits. > > A few problems were identified: > > 1. This is very consistently implemented. > > 2. Normative text on this is split between the two RFCs. > > 3. That text isn't completely unambiguous. > > We won't fix the first, but we can at least fix the others. Proposed changes: > > https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/1005/files > > (Thanks to Willy and Kazuho for helping to work through this, and > Stefan and Cory for their input.) > > Chairs, Francesca, we're in IESG processing for the draft. Is this > change likely to be a problem? > > Cheers, > Martin
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2022 00:26:07 UTC