Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-01

On Sun, Feb 6, 2022, at 04:10, Wenbo Zhu wrote:
> I wonder if an http-wg version of "ASN.1" definition is needed here. We 
> certainly won't switch to bhttp anytime soon, and there will likely be 
> performance gaps too to adopt such a new encoding. 

That's a strong claim.  Is there something in the design that suggests to you a performance deficit?

> When streaming is needed, a new wire protocol will likely be needed in 
> order to tunnel bhttp.

How so?  Maybe I'm not understanding your comment, but the format supports streaming.

Received on Sunday, 6 February 2022 22:08:38 UTC