- From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 09:08:04 +1100
- To: "Wenbo Zhu" <wenboz@google.com>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Tommy Pauly" <tpauly@apple.com>, "Christopher Wood" <caw@heapingbits.net>
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022, at 04:10, Wenbo Zhu wrote: > I wonder if an http-wg version of "ASN.1" definition is needed here. We > certainly won't switch to bhttp anytime soon, and there will likely be > performance gaps too to adopt such a new encoding. That's a strong claim. Is there something in the design that suggests to you a performance deficit? > When streaming is needed, a new wire protocol will likely be needed in > order to tunnel bhttp. How so? Maybe I'm not understanding your comment, but the format supports streaming.
Received on Sunday, 6 February 2022 22:08:38 UTC