- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:46:15 +1100
- To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Huh. Never said *I* had to be consistent :) Yeah, that seems like a good idea. I've opened: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1974 Thanks, > On 17 Feb 2022, at 9:41 am, Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey Mark, > > On Wed, 16 Feb 2022, 22:28 Mark Nottingham, <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > I wasn't terribly happy about including ABNF in SF, but IIRC some really wanted it because it's expected for HTTP headers. *shrug* > > I'd recommend avoiding it if possible, or at least only using it in separate ABNF blocks (not prose). > > I can get behind that. Although I'll note that proxy-status has 29 instances in prose and priorities has 2. Maybe we should fix these up as part of AUTH48, in order to set some consistent examples? > > Cheers > Lucas -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2022 22:46:37 UTC