- From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:54:26 +1100
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
I just merged the pull request. On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, at 11:25, Martin Thomson wrote: > Just a follow-up to this. We've had a few more eyeballs on the text > and I think we're all happy with all the grammar. > > Anyone who hasn't looked yet, see https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/1005 > > Chairs, where do we stand? > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022, at 16:51, Martin Thomson wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> We've had a bunch of discussion about the interpretation of RFC 7540 >> and 7541 regarding updates to the HPACK header table size limits. >> >> A few problems were identified: >> >> 1. This is very consistently implemented. >> >> 2. Normative text on this is split between the two RFCs. >> >> 3. That text isn't completely unambiguous. >> >> We won't fix the first, but we can at least fix the others. Proposed changes: >> >> https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/1005/files >> >> (Thanks to Willy and Kazuho for helping to work through this, and >> Stefan and Cory for their input.) >> >> Chairs, Francesca, we're in IESG processing for the draft. Is this >> change likely to be a problem? >> >> Cheers, >> Martin
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2022 21:54:59 UTC