Hi Robert, Thanks for the review! On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:47 PM Robert Wilton via Datatracker < noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: No Objection > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Hi, > > Thanks for this document. Given how short this document is, I found it > somewhat harder to read than I expected, and hence I have a few minor and > editorial suggestions (that you are welcome to take or leave) that may > improve > readability. > > [RFC8441] defines an extension to HTTP/2 which is also useful in > HTTP/3. > > 1. I would suggest adding the referenced doc title here rather than > leading the > introduction with just the RFC reference number. 2. I think that you need > at > least an informative reference to HTTP/2. 3. The references to both HTTP/2 > and > HTTP/3 should be included when they are cited in the first sentence. > > 3. Websockets Upgrade over HTTP/3 > > 4. I would suggest moving the 2nd paragraph that considers stream closure > to > the end of section 3, since the 1st, 3rd and 4th paragraphs all seem to be > more > closely related in their subject matter. > These are all good suggestions, thanks! I've fixed them in the Editor's Draft and will release a new -03 version shortly.Received on Monday, 7 February 2022 23:07:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 7 February 2022 23:07:19 UTC