Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: (with COMMENT)

Hi Robert,

Thanks for the review!

On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:47 PM Robert Wilton via Datatracker <> wrote:

> Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02: No Objection
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hi,
> Thanks for this document.  Given how short this document is, I found it
> somewhat harder to read than I expected, and hence I have a few minor and
> editorial suggestions (that you are welcome to take or leave) that may
> improve
> readability.
>    [RFC8441] defines an extension to HTTP/2 which is also useful in
>    HTTP/3.
> 1. I would suggest adding the referenced doc title here rather than
> leading the
> introduction with just the RFC reference number. 2. I think that you need
> at
> least an informative reference to HTTP/2. 3. The references to both HTTP/2
> and
> HTTP/3 should be included when they are cited in the first sentence.
>   3.  Websockets Upgrade over HTTP/3
> 4. I would suggest moving the 2nd paragraph that considers stream closure
> to
> the end of section 3, since the 1st, 3rd and 4th paragraphs all seem to be
> more
> closely related in their subject matter.

These are all good suggestions, thanks! I've fixed them in the Editor's
Draft and will release a new -03 version shortly.

Received on Monday, 7 February 2022 23:07:19 UTC