Whatever sleuthing we do here, this error has been noted already: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4072 Can we just reject this erratum? On Mon, Jan 10, 2022, at 23:41, Julian Reschke wrote: > Am 10.01.2022 um 13:38 schrieb jk: >> >> That's my fault, should be html version rather than text version, just >> look the picture above. >> ... > > For RFCs from that time, the HTML version has no official standing. It > is autogenerated from the plain text RFC, and that one indeed has > garbage characters in the ToC. > > Best regards, Julian > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany > Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782Received on Monday, 10 January 2022 22:34:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 10 January 2022 22:34:23 UTC