W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2022

Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6814)

From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:33:47 +1100
Message-Id: <ae41b3c5-ff17-4906-b5e8-1bd84431fc9a@beta.fastmail.com>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Whatever sleuthing we do here, this error has been noted already:

https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4072

Can we just reject this erratum?

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022, at 23:41, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Am 10.01.2022 um 13:38 schrieb jk:
>> 
>> That's my fault, should be html version rather than text version, just 
>> look the picture above.
>> ...
>
> For RFCs from that time, the HTML version has no official standing. It 
> is autogenerated from the plain text RFC, and that one indeed has 
> garbage characters in the ToC.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany
> Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782
Received on Monday, 10 January 2022 22:34:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 10 January 2022 22:34:23 UTC