Tim: thanks for your review. I will send the document forward and the authors can address your questions at the same time as the IESG reviews. Thanks, Francesca From: Tim Bray via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Date: Wednesday, 19 January 2022 at 19:50 To: art@ietf.org <art@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets.all@ietf.org <draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets.all@ietf.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, last-call@ietf.org <last-call@ietf.org> Subject: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02 Reviewer: Tim Bray Review result: Ready with Issues Generally looks good to me, but I'm sufficiently shallow on QUICK-related stuff that I might miss something QUIC-incompatible. Nit: Section 1: The link to "Appendix A.3" is wrong, seems to just link back to this draft. Issue: Section 2, 2nd paragraph: It feels like there could be a MUST or SHOULD in here so Websockets implementers can be sure they're doing the right thing to get an orderly shutdown? Issue: Section 2, 4th paragraph: This makes perfect sense, but is it Websockets-specific? Does it actually belong in draft-ietf-quic-http?
Received on Monday, 24 January 2022 10:38:19 UTC