- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:03:21 +1100
- To: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Roberto, The best place for this kind of discussion is probably the rfc-markdown list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-markdown Cheers, > On 21 Feb 2022, at 8:34 pm, Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Currently, to reference a keyword on kramdown-rfc > you need to do something like this e.g. in Notational Convention > > ``` > ## Notational Conventions > ... > The definitions [representation], [representation data], .. > > [representation]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7231#section-3 > [representation data]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7231#section-3.1 > > ``` > > Instead, it would be great to support something like the following > > ``` > ## Notational Conventions > ... > The definitions [representation], [representation data], .. > > [representation]: {{Section 3 of RFC7231}}} > [representation data]: {{Section 3 of RFC7231}}} > > ``` > > Moreover, resolving specification aliases, e.g. > > ... > This document relies on {{!SEMANTICS=RFC7231}} > The definitions [representation], [representation data], .. > > [representation]: {{Section 3 of SEMANTICS}}} > [representation data]: {{Section 3 of SEMANTICS}}} > > ``` > would be even better. > > I filed an issue here > https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629/issues/155 > > Comments welcome :) > > Have a nice day, > R. > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 21 February 2022 22:03:43 UTC