- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:03:21 +1100
- To: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Roberto,
The best place for this kind of discussion is probably the rfc-markdown list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-markdown
Cheers,
> On 21 Feb 2022, at 8:34 pm, Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Currently, to reference a keyword on kramdown-rfc
> you need to do something like this e.g. in Notational Convention
>
> ```
> ## Notational Conventions
> ...
> The definitions [representation], [representation data], ..
>
> [representation]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7231#section-3
> [representation data]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7231#section-3.1
>
> ```
>
> Instead, it would be great to support something like the following
>
> ```
> ## Notational Conventions
> ...
> The definitions [representation], [representation data], ..
>
> [representation]: {{Section 3 of RFC7231}}}
> [representation data]: {{Section 3 of RFC7231}}}
>
> ```
>
> Moreover, resolving specification aliases, e.g.
>
> ...
> This document relies on {{!SEMANTICS=RFC7231}}
> The definitions [representation], [representation data], ..
>
> [representation]: {{Section 3 of SEMANTICS}}}
> [representation data]: {{Section 3 of SEMANTICS}}}
>
> ```
> would be even better.
>
> I filed an issue here
> https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629/issues/155
>
> Comments welcome :)
>
> Have a nice day,
> R.
>
--
Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 21 February 2022 22:03:43 UTC