- From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 11:20:34 -0700
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2022 18:21:59 UTC
Howdy HTTP Enthusiasts, Over in MASQUE, we're defining a way to proxy UDP that's very similar to CONNECT but for UDP instead of TCP [1]. For HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, we've landed on using extended CONNECT (RFC 8441), and for HTTP/1.x we've landed on using Upgrade. However, in HTTP/1.x the client still needs to send a method and we're wondering which one was best: WebSocket uses GET but using CONNECT would be more consistent with what we're doing with HTTP/2 and HTTP/3. Does anyone have thoughts or opinions on this? Please respond to this email or on the GitHub issue [2]. Thanks! David [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp [2] https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp/issues/57
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2022 18:21:59 UTC