Hey, On Wed, 2 Feb 2022, 11:57 Roberto Polli, <roberto@teamdigitale.governo.it> wrote: > Hi Lucas et al, > > > Il giorno mer 2 feb 2022 alle ore 10:53 Lucas Pardue > <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > , I've prepared a new pull request that sits somewhere between option 2 > and 3. > > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1919 > Thanks Lucas, I will provide some feedback there, > but a gdoc might be a better discussion tool > for a major rewrite like this one. > I don't view this as a major rewrite from an editorial perspective. The core structure of the document remains the same. Its mainly s/digest/representation-digest, removal of digest-specific prose,and tidy up of emergent gaps or basic syntax. The WG process uses GitHub. We have rendered HTML and diff tools. I don't see how a gDoc improves anything; rather it would generate more work and fragmentation. I would push back on that. > I will try to get some feedback from implementers. I know > it will take *some* time though :) > To echo some of the questions Annabelle asked, I would ask implementers: Are you familiar with Structured Fields and the variety of off-the-shelf parser/serializer libraries ready to use? If we told you that your current use of Digest is incorrect, would you change anything? If yes to change: given that they both express ahash of the same input data, do you see is any other material difference between Digest and Represenation-Digest? Cheers Lucas > Have a nice day, > R. >
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2022 20:57:53 UTC