Friday, 28 December 2001
- Re (5): Re[2]: baselines & namespaces
- RE: Re (4): Re[2]: baselines & namespaces
- Re (4): Re[2]: baselines & namespaces
Thursday, 27 December 2001
Tuesday, 25 December 2001
Monday, 24 December 2001
Saturday, 22 December 2001
Thursday, 20 December 2001
Wednesday, 19 December 2001
Tuesday, 18 December 2001
- RE: baselines & namespaces
- RE: BASELINE-CONTROL
- Re: baselines & namespaces
- RE: BASELINE-CONTROL
- RE: baselines & namespaces
Monday, 17 December 2001
- Re: baselines & namespaces
- RE: BASELINE-COLLECTION Property
- RE: BASELINE-COLLECTION Property
- RE: BASELINE-COLLECTION Property
- RE: BASELINE-COLLECTION Property
- Re: BASELINE-COLLECTION Property
- BASELINE-COLLECTION Property
Friday, 14 December 2001
- RE: Re[4]: Re (2): Creating new version-controlled bindings refer encing existing VHR's
- Re[2]: Re (2): Creating new version-controlled bindings referencing existing VHR's
- RE: BASELINE-CONTROL
- Re: BASELINE-CONTROL
- BASELINE-CONTROL
- RE: Parallel Development
- RE: Parallel Development
- Re: REPORT method
- REPORT method
- RE: Parallel Development
- RE: baselines & namespaces
Thursday, 13 December 2001
- baselines & namespaces
- Re: Parallel Development
- Parallel Development
- RE: Workspaces and File&Folder Hierarchy
- Re: Workspaces and File&Folder Hierarchy
Wednesday, 12 December 2001
- RE: Some questions on Configurations
- RE: Some questions on Configurations
- Re: Some questions on Configurations
- Re: VCR Fork and GET
- Some questions on Configurations
- VCR Fork and GET
- RE: Workspaces and File&Folder Hierarchy
- Re: Re (2): Creating new version-controlled bindings referencing existing VHR's
- RE: Re (2): Creating new version-controlled bindings referencing existing VHR's
Tuesday, 11 December 2001
- RE: Creating new version-controlled bindings referencing existing VHR's
- Re: Re (2): Creating new version-controlled bindings referencing existing VHR's
- Re (2): Creating new version-controlled bindings referencing existing VHR's
- RE: [daniel.kirmse@sap.com: WebDAV/DeltaV: GET on Version Tree]
- RE: Workspaces and File&Folder Hierarchy
- RE: Creating new version-controlled bindings referencing existing VHR's
Monday, 10 December 2001
- Re: Workspaces and File&Folder Hierarchy
- Re: [daniel.kirmse@sap.com: WebDAV/DeltaV: GET on Version Tree]
- Workspaces and File&Folder Hierarchy
- GET on version tree/Workspaces
- [daniel.kirmse@sap.com: WebDAV/DeltaV: GET on Version Tree]
Thursday, 6 December 2001
Wednesday, 5 December 2001
- RE: version resource and locking
- RE: VR / VHR and check in/out
- RE: version resource and locking
- RE: VR / VHR and check in/out
- RE: version resource and locking
- VR / VHR and check in/out
- version resource and locking
Thursday, 29 November 2001
Saturday, 24 November 2001
Friday, 23 November 2001
Tuesday, 6 November 2001
Monday, 5 November 2001
Saturday, 3 November 2001
Friday, 2 November 2001
- Re: Copying DAV:comment on CHECKIN and VERSION-CONTROL
- RE: Copying DAV:comment on CHECKIN and VERSION-CONTROL
- Copying DAV:comment on CHECKIN and VERSION-CONTROL
Thursday, 1 November 2001
Wednesday, 31 October 2001
- RE: Resource class does not list the REPORT method
- RE: Resource class does not list the REPORT method
- RE: Resource class does not list the REPORT method
- RE: Re (3): Definition of a configuration
- Resource class does not list the REPORT method
- Re (3): Definition of a configuration
Tuesday, 30 October 2001
Monday, 29 October 2001
- Re (2): Definition of a configuration
- RE: Content-Type / charset in RFC2518, deltaV and ACL specs
- RE: Definition of a configuration
- RE: Definition of a configuration
- RE: Definition of a configuration
- RE: Definition of a configuration
- Re: Definition of a configuration
- RE: Definition of a configuration
Sunday, 28 October 2001
Friday, 26 October 2001
Thursday, 25 October 2001
- RE: What happened to working baselines in draft 20?
- What happened to working baselines in draft 20?
- RE: Another error in section 22?
- RE: DAV:version-controlled-configuration property...
- FW: Another error in section 22?
- FW: DAV:version-controlled-configuration property...
- DAV:version-controlled-configuration property...
Wednesday, 24 October 2001
- RE: DTD for supported-method-set (3.1.3)
- RE: DTD for supported-method-set (3.1.3)
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- DTD confusion (mail thread from 2001Q1)
- RE: Issues with section 22 of the deltav protocol document...
- RE: DTD for supported-method-set (3.1.3)
- RE: DTD for supported-method-set (3.1.3)
- RE: DTD for supported-method-set (3.1.3)
- RE: DTD for supported-method-set (3.1.3)
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-20.txt
- RE: DTD for supported-method-set (3.1.3)
- RE: DTD for supported-method-set (3.1.3)
- RE: Small mistake in section 16.2
- RE: Eclipsed resources...
- RE: DTD for supported-method-set (3.1.3)
Tuesday, 23 October 2001
- Re: Submission: deltav subset
- RE: Guidance of DAV: namespace usage in drafts
- DTD for supported-method-set (3.1.3)
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- Issues with section 22 of the deltav protocol document...
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- Eclipsed resources...
- Small mistake in section 16.2
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- FW: Submission: deltav subset
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-19.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-deltav-subset-00.txt
- Guidance of DAV: namespace usage in drafts
- MS webfolder bug on COPY/MOVE
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- Re: Submission: deltav subset
Monday, 22 October 2001
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- Re: Submission: deltav subset
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- MS webfolder bug on COPY/MOVE
- How to patch with SQUID?
Saturday, 20 October 2001
Friday, 19 October 2001
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- Re: Change Request Management (was: Submission: deltav subset)
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
- Change Request Management (was: Submission: deltav subset)
- RE: Submission: deltav subset
Thursday, 18 October 2001
Thursday, 11 October 2001
- RE: Baselines and Bindings
- RE: Baselines and Bindings
- RE: Baselines and Bindings
- RE: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- RE: How to enforce the preconditions regarding modifying a baseli ne collection
- RE: Baselines and Bindings
- RE: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- RE: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- RE: How to enforce the preconditions regarding modifying a baseli ne collection
- RE: Finding the Baseline-Controlled Collection given a working ba seline...
- RE: Baselines and Bindings
Wednesday, 10 October 2001
- RE: Missing reference in DeltaV - XML schema
- RE: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- RE: Missing reference in DeltaV - XML schema
- RE: Missing reference in DeltaV - XML schema
- Baselines and Bindings
- Missing reference in DeltaV - XML schema
- RE: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- RE: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- RE: Didn't we agree to change supported-live-property-set?
- RE: Didn't we agree to change supported-live-property-set?
- RE: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- RE: Didn't we agree to change supported-live-property-set?
- Didn't we agree to change supported-live-property-set?
- RE: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- RE: Finding the Baseline-Controlled Collection given a working ba seli ne...
- RE: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- Re: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- RE: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- RE: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- RE: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- RE: [ACL] principal-collection-set
- Proposed editorial change for deltav spec (WAS: [ACL] principal-c ollection-set)
- RE: How to enforce the preconditions regarding modifying a baseli ne collection
- RE: Removing a collection from baseline-control and deleting VCCs etc
- RE: Finding the Baseline-Controlled Collection given a working ba seli ne...
- How to enforce the preconditions regarding modifying a baseline c ollection
- Removing a collection from baseline-control and deleting VCCs etc
- Finding the Baseline-Controlled Collection given a working baseli ne...
Tuesday, 9 October 2001
Sunday, 7 October 2001
- RE: "Closing" an activity
- RE: Allowing non-default options for auto-checkout and -checkin
- RE: "Closing" an activity
- RE: Creating new version-controlled bindings referencing existing VHR's
- Creating new version-controlled bindings referencing existing VHR's
- Re: "Closing" an activity
- "Closing" an activity
- Allowing non-default options for auto-checkout and -checkin
Saturday, 6 October 2001
Wednesday, 3 October 2001
Thursday, 4 October 2001
- RE: options
- RE: Content-Type / charset in RFC2518, deltaV and ACL specs
- RE: options
- RE: Why does MERGE automatically checkin resources related to act ivities?
- Re: Why does MERGE automatically checkin resources related to act ivities?
- DAV:options
- RE: Content-Type / charset in RFC2518, deltaV and ACL specs
Wednesday, 3 October 2001
- Flag making DAV:response elements of UPDATE and MERGE optional
- RE: Content-Type / charset in RFC2518, deltaV and ACL specs
- RE: Content-Type / charset in RFC2518, deltaV and ACL specs
- RE: Content-Type / charset in RFC2518, deltaV and ACL specs
- Eclipsed version-controlled collections
- UPDATE with activity source
- RE: Content-Type / charset in RFC2518, deltaV and ACL specs
- Content-Type / charset in RFC2518, deltaV and ACL specs
- Re: merge-preview Report, MERGE and UPDATE responses
- RE: Why does MERGE automatically checkin resources related to act ivities?
- RE: Why does MERGE automatically checkin resources related to act ivities?
- Re: Why does MERGE automatically checkin resources related to act ivities?
- RE: List of DeltaV questions, issues, and extensions
- [Fwd: List of DeltaV questions, issues, and extensions]
Tuesday, 2 October 2001
- RE: [ACL] Standard privileges for DeltaV operations?
- RE: [ACL] Standard privileges for DeltaV operations?
- RE: [ACL] Standard privileges for DeltaV operations?
- Standard privileges for DeltaV operations?
- RE: Why does MERGE automatically checkin resources related to act ivities?
- RE: Why does MERGE automatically checkin resources related to act ivities?
- RE: Why does MERGE automatically checkin resources related to act ivities?
Monday, 1 October 2001
- RE: Simple editorial change needed to section 13.9
- RE: Clarification on definition of a configuration....
Tuesday, 2 October 2001
Monday, 1 October 2001
- Re: Why does MERGE automatically checkin resources related to act ivities?
- RE: Protocol Action: Versioning Extensions to WebDAV to Proposed Standard
- Protocol Action: Versioning Extensions to WebDAV to Proposed Standard
- Protocol Action: Versioning Extensions to WebDAV to Proposed Standard
- RE: Clarification on definition of a configuration....
- Re: Clarification on what exactly is captured in the Baseline Col lection...
- Re: Where is the "working baseline" concept defined?
- Re: Clarification on definition of a configuration....
- Re: Why does MERGE automatically checkin resources related to act ivities?
- Where is the "working baseline" concept defined?
- FW: Simple editorial change needed to section 13.9