- From: Peter Raymond <Peter.Raymond@merant.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:22:46 +0100
- To: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>, "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
- Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20CF1CE11441D411919C0008C7C5A13B02AD3001@stalmail.eu.merant.com>
Hi,
Greg's description seems to be clearer, I like it.
Regards,
--
Peter Raymond - MERANT
Principal Architect (PVCS)
Tel: +44 (0)1727 813362
Fax: +44 (0)1727 869804
mailto:Peter.Raymond@merant.com
WWW: http://www.merant.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein@lyra.org]
Sent: 01 October 2001 12:28
To: Clemm, Geoff
Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: Re: Clarification on definition of a configuration....
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 08:59:48AM -0400, Clemm, Geoff wrote:
>
> From: Peter Raymond [mailto:Peter.Raymond@merant.com]
>
> The statement in section 12 says:
>
> "A configuration is a set of resources that consists of a root
> collection and all members of that root collection that are not
> members of another configuration."
>...
> What in the definition led you to this conclusion? (This is a real
> question, not a rhetorical question, because if something in the text
> led you to this conclusion, it should be fixed).
Maybe change to:
"A configuration is a set of resources that consists of a root
collection and all members of that root collection except those
resources which are members of another configuration."
IMO, that is a bit clearer that the resources *can* be in another
configuration, and that they are excluded from the parent collection.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Monday, 1 October 2001 08:25:03 UTC