- From: Peter Raymond <Peter.Raymond@merant.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:22:46 +0100
- To: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>, "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
- Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20CF1CE11441D411919C0008C7C5A13B02AD3001@stalmail.eu.merant.com>
Hi, Greg's description seems to be clearer, I like it. Regards, -- Peter Raymond - MERANT Principal Architect (PVCS) Tel: +44 (0)1727 813362 Fax: +44 (0)1727 869804 mailto:Peter.Raymond@merant.com WWW: http://www.merant.com -----Original Message----- From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein@lyra.org] Sent: 01 October 2001 12:28 To: Clemm, Geoff Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Subject: Re: Clarification on definition of a configuration.... On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 08:59:48AM -0400, Clemm, Geoff wrote: > > From: Peter Raymond [mailto:Peter.Raymond@merant.com] > > The statement in section 12 says: > > "A configuration is a set of resources that consists of a root > collection and all members of that root collection that are not > members of another configuration." >... > What in the definition led you to this conclusion? (This is a real > question, not a rhetorical question, because if something in the text > led you to this conclusion, it should be fixed). Maybe change to: "A configuration is a set of resources that consists of a root collection and all members of that root collection except those resources which are members of another configuration." IMO, that is a bit clearer that the resources *can* be in another configuration, and that they are excluded from the parent collection. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Monday, 1 October 2001 08:25:03 UTC