- From: Roy Seto <Roy.Seto@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 21:53:54 -0700
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
"Clemm, Geoff" wrote: > > From: Roy Seto [mailto:Roy.Seto@oracle.com] > > I'm following up on this discussion from > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-dav-versioning/2001OctDec/0021.html > > in a separate thread. Would it be appropriate to consider part of > these changes in the editorial pass for the initial RFC? > > I believe that this functionality can be achieved in a way that is > compatible with the current draft, i.e. no changes to the current > draft are needed for servers to support this extension. (Note: I > would not want to actually make the extension in the editorial pass). Ok. > or, > > - Around Section 3.2.2, define additional property names to hold > options for auto-checkout and auto-checkin operations. > > That is how I'd want to define the extensions, but is more than I'd > want to do in an editorial pass. Let's define those new properties in > draft form, and add it to the "proposed extensions" list. (we already > have one such proposed extension on the web site, the "checkin URI" > extension). Ok. That sounds like a reasonable resolution to me. Thanks, Roy
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2001 00:50:43 UTC