Re: Allowing non-default options for auto-checkout and -checkin

"Clemm, Geoff" wrote:
> 
>    From: Roy Seto [mailto:Roy.Seto@oracle.com]
> 
>    I'm following up on this discussion from
> 
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-dav-versioning/2001OctDec/0021.html
> 
>    in a separate thread. Would it be appropriate to consider part of
>    these changes in the editorial pass for the initial RFC?
> 
> I believe that this functionality can be achieved in a way that is
> compatible with the current draft, i.e. no changes to the current
> draft are needed for servers to support this extension.  (Note: I
> would not want to actually make the extension in the editorial pass).

Ok.

>      or,
> 
>       - Around Section 3.2.2, define additional property names to hold
>         options for auto-checkout and auto-checkin operations.
> 
> That is how I'd want to define the extensions, but is more than I'd
> want to do in an editorial pass.  Let's define those new properties in
> draft form, and add it to the "proposed extensions" list.  (we already
> have one such proposed extension on the web site, the "checkin URI"
> extension).

Ok. That sounds like a reasonable resolution to me.

Thanks,
Roy

Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2001 00:50:43 UTC