- From: <Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 19:01:18 -0500
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
- Cc: Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de
"Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com> wrote: > But will there be another open window sometime in the future when > this topic can be discussed again and a consensus of the group > could change the definition of a configuration ? > > Definitely, when we are going for next standard level (draft > standard). That will be a good time to revise any terminology that > has proven to be confusing (such as the notorious "MOVE is > COPY/DELETE" statement in 2518 ... always fun to pick on that :-). That's good enough for me. So I won't discuss the definition of a configuration any more for the time being. Out of curiosity :-) Could I get a feedback from some of the readers of the mailing list ? Just a note whether they think this topic should be discussed in the future or that they think it's irrelevant and I should forget about it. Then a plea to the parties I think are big players concerning implementing DeltaV. Is there any chance of a joint effort for creating a scenarios or validation suite document. From the top of my mind I can imagine Rational, Oracle, Merant, Microsoft, Apache, ... Cheers, Edgar -- edgar@edgarschwarz.de http://www.edgarschwarz.de * DOSenfreie Zone. Running Active Oberon. * Make it as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2001 19:01:19 UTC