- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:07:04 -0400
- To: "DeltaV (E-mail)" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>, ACL@webdav.org
Just to make sure we're on the same page, the interaction between the client and a server will not be to ask each resource "where is your xxx-collection-set", but rather to ask the first encountered resource in a session "where are the xxx-collection-set values on your server", and then use those values for the rest of the session. This means that you would not be combining requests for xxx-collection-set information with the other property information, but rather will be asking for xxx-collection-set information around the same time you are asking for OPTIONS information (i.e. what options are supported by your server), which is why the xxx-collection-set information is currently marshalled via OPTIONS, since *that* allows you to get all this "configuration" information in one request. Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] > 1) Keep DeltaV with OPTIONS, and make ACL use OPTIONS for consistency > 2) Change DeltaV to use properties, and have ACL use properties > 3) Have DeltaV and ACL use different ways to obtain xxx-collection-set > > The main situation I *really* want to avoid is: > 4) Change DeltaV to use properties, and have ACL end up using OPTIONS > or some other non-property mechanism inconsistent with DeltaV. > > So for those folks that care about this (probably not many :-), > which choice do you prefer? Obviously, it MUST be consistent across deltaV, ACL and future WebDAV versions. I honestly think that 2) is the best solution. For instance, it allows a client to collect all it needs to know about a resource with one request.
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2001 13:07:41 UTC