- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 16:18:23 -0400
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
That rewording is fine with me. I'll make the swap.
Cheers,
Geoff
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Raymond [mailto:Peter.Raymond@merant.com]
Greg's description seems to be clearer, I like it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein@lyra.org]
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 08:59:48AM -0400, Clemm, Geoff wrote:
>
> From: Peter Raymond [mailto:Peter.Raymond@merant.com]
>
> The statement in section 12 says:
>
> "A configuration is a set of resources that consists of a root
> collection and all members of that root collection that are not
> members of another configuration."
>...
> What in the definition led you to this conclusion? (This is a real
> question, not a rhetorical question, because if something in the text
> led you to this conclusion, it should be fixed).
Maybe change to:
"A configuration is a set of resources that consists of a root
collection and all members of that root collection except those
resources which are members of another configuration."
IMO, that is a bit clearer that the resources *can* be in another
configuration, and that they are excluded from the parent collection.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2001 05:59:18 UTC