- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 16:18:23 -0400
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
That rewording is fine with me. I'll make the swap. Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Peter Raymond [mailto:Peter.Raymond@merant.com] Greg's description seems to be clearer, I like it. -----Original Message----- From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein@lyra.org] On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 08:59:48AM -0400, Clemm, Geoff wrote: > > From: Peter Raymond [mailto:Peter.Raymond@merant.com] > > The statement in section 12 says: > > "A configuration is a set of resources that consists of a root > collection and all members of that root collection that are not > members of another configuration." >... > What in the definition led you to this conclusion? (This is a real > question, not a rhetorical question, because if something in the text > led you to this conclusion, it should be fixed). Maybe change to: "A configuration is a set of resources that consists of a root collection and all members of that root collection except those resources which are members of another configuration." IMO, that is a bit clearer that the resources *can* be in another configuration, and that they are excluded from the parent collection. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2001 05:59:18 UTC