- From: Alan Kent <ajk@mds.rmit.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 12:27:16 +1100
- To: "Ietf-Dav-Versioning (E-mail)" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:26:29AM +0100, Kirmse, Daniel wrote: > Thanks so far! But what about this: > > >But I agree with Alan that the most important thing about a workspace > >is that it has at most one versioned-controlled resource for a given > >version history. > > But it is still possible to have a version tree (not a single line of > descent of versions for the only VCR in the workspace)??? A version controlled resource can have a tree of version resources. But I am not sure I understand what you mean by 'for the only VCR in the workspace' - I am missing something from a previous post maybe? > Well it would > produce a ambiguity, wouldn't it? And then there is no unambigious merge or > baselining can take place. Sorry, you have lost me here. Are you proposing something above then? > ... > (was that understandable???) Ummmm. Sorry, not to me (so I probably should not be replying! :-) > regards > Daniel Alan
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2001 20:27:49 UTC