public-vocabs@w3.org from February 2012 by author

Aaron Bradley

• Re: One Book with many offers (was Re: Multiple "Products" per page, one product Title) - a tested solution (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Multiple "Products" per page, one product Title (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Multiple Ratings in one Review (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: Breadcrumbs: Last Item Not Hyperlinked (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Richer information in the microdata than in the visible content in the HTML page: what is the good practice ? (Tuesday, 14 February)

Aaron Brown

• Re: Choosing the Appropriate Schema: clinical trials (Friday, 17 February)

Adrian Giurca

• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: How to add license information to a CreativeWork? / How to mark obscured informations? (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• doap:Project versus CreativeWork (Friday, 24 February)
• One Book with many offers (was Re: Multiple "Products" per page, one product Title) - a tested solution (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Multiple "Products" per page, one product Title (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Richer information in the microdata than in the visible content in the HTML page: what is the good practice ? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Describing several video in the same page (Monday, 13 February)

Alexander Shubin

• RE: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") (Friday, 17 February)
• RE: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") (Friday, 17 February)

B McGlamery

• A few general questions about CreativeWork (Thursday, 23 February)
• A few general questions about CreativeWork (Thursday, 23 February)

Bernard Vatant

• Re: Project vocabulary (Monday, 27 February)
• Multilinguality and schema.org (Monday, 6 February)

Bob Ferris

• Re: Project vocabulary (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: metadata about relationships (Thursday, 23 February)

Christian Bäuerlein

• Re: Schema for Transport Data (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Schema for Transport Data (Tuesday, 7 February)

Chuck

• How to add license information to a CreativeWork? / How to mark obscured informations? (Monday, 27 February)
• How to add license information to a CreativeWork? / How to mark obscured informations? (Saturday, 25 February)
• Two questions about itemprop (Saturday, 25 February)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Comment versus UserComments (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Comment versus UserComments (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Comment versus UserComments (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: attachments to CreativeWorks (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Submission of draft education terms (LRMI) for discussion (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: How to add license information to a CreativeWork? / How to mark obscured informations? (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Project vocabulary' (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Project vocabulary (Monday, 27 February)
• table of schema.org proposals now in Web Schemas wiki at W3C (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Friday, 24 February)
• proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event (Friday, 24 February)
• SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: metadata about relationships (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: metadata about relationships (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: attachments to CreativeWorks (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: A few general questions about CreativeWork (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Describing several video in the same page (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Process Question (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Process Question (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Error in example at http://schema.org/Movie (Wednesday, 1 February)

Daniel Dulitz

• Re: Comment versus UserComments (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: attachments to CreativeWorks (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: metadata about relationships (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Comment versus UserComments (Wednesday, 22 February)

Danny Ayers

• Re: Project vocabulary (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Project vocabulary (Monday, 27 February)
• Project vocabulary (Sunday, 26 February)

Denis Igin

• schema.org content monetization (Saturday, 18 February)

Dorothy Ng

• Use of Schema.org (Monday, 27 February)

Elliot Cohen

• Choosing the Appropriate Schema: clinical trials (Sunday, 12 February)

Evain, Jean-Pierre

• RE: Project vocabulary (Monday, 27 February)
• RE: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Friday, 24 February)

François Daoust

• Marking micro-blogging status messages? (Wednesday, 22 February)

Greg Grossmeier

• Submission of draft education terms (LRMI) for discussion (Tuesday, 28 February)

Guha

• Re: rNews, Schema.org and The New York Times (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Process Question (Wednesday, 1 February)

Gunnar Bittersmann

• Re: Breadcrumbs: Last Item Not Hyperlinked (Friday, 10 February)

Henry Andrews

• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: [untitled comments on Comics schemas] (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions (Wednesday, 22 February)

Irfanullah Jan

• Breadcrumbs: Last Item Not Hyperlinked (Thursday, 9 February)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") (Friday, 17 February)

Jack Miller

• Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] (Monday, 13 February)

Jason Douglas

• Re: Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Two questions about itemprop (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: metadata about relationships (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: attachments to CreativeWorks (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: metadata about relationships (Thursday, 23 February)

Jason Ronallo

• Re: Two questions about itemprop (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Add a biography property to http://schema.org/Person (Sunday, 26 February)

Jean Delahousse

• Re: Comment versus UserComments (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Richer information in the microdata than in the visible content in the HTML page: what is the good practice ? (Monday, 13 February)
• Richer information in the microdata than in the visible content in the HTML page: what is the good practice ? (Monday, 13 February)
• Describing several video in the same page (Monday, 13 February)

jean delahousse KC

• Re: rNews, Schema.org and The New York Times (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Richer information in the microdata than in the visible content in the HTML page: what is the good practice ? (Tuesday, 14 February)

Jesse Friedman

• Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] (Monday, 13 February)

Jocelyn Fournier

• Re: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") (Thursday, 16 February)

John Erickson

• Re: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") (Friday, 17 February)

Kooteo

• Re: rNews, Schema.org and The New York Times (Thursday, 16 February)

Kurt Maine

• RE: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] (Friday, 10 February)

Leonardo Picado

• RE: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] (Friday, 10 February)

Lin Clark

• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Friday, 24 February)
• Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Friday, 24 February)

Martin Hepp

• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• ANN: Free GoodRelations / Google Rich Snippets Module for xt:Commerce released (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: How to add license information to a CreativeWork? / How to mark obscured informations? (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Schema for Transport Data (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Product type (Thursday, 2 February)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: Project vocabulary (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org (Friday, 24 February)

Olson, Peter

• RE: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: [untitled comments on Comics schemas] (Sunday, 26 February)
• Comics Schema Update and Open Questions (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: Comics Schema Draft (formerly Process Question) (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: Periodical Schema & Scholarly Journals [formerly Process Question] (Sunday, 5 February)
• RE: Comics Schema Draft (formerly Process Question) (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: Process Question (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: Process Question (Wednesday, 1 February)

Palmer, Mark E. Mr.

• subcribe (Tuesday, 21 February)

Robert Schroeder

• Re: Product type (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Product type (Thursday, 2 February)
• Product type (Thursday, 2 February)

Sandhaus, Evan

• rNews, Schema.org and The New York Times (Thursday, 16 February)

Scott Brandley

• Re: Multiple Ratings in one Review (Monday, 20 February)
• Multiple Ratings in one Review (Friday, 17 February)

Stéphane Corlosquet

• Re: Comment versus UserComments (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Add a biography property to http://schema.org/Person (Saturday, 18 February)

suresh devaraj

• Itemtype for tvchannels and package (Tuesday, 21 February)

Thad Guidry

• Re: Comment versus UserComments (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Project vocabulary (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Comment versus UserComments (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Richer information in the microdata than in the visible content in the HTML page: what is the good practice ? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Comics Schema Draft (formerly Process Question) (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: Process Question (Thursday, 2 February)

Tim van Oostrom

• Re: Product type (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Product type (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Product type (Thursday, 2 February)

Vladimir Panteleev

• Web forums (Tuesday, 21 February)

Will Norris

• Re: Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) (Friday, 24 February)
• attachments to CreativeWorks (Tuesday, 21 February)
• metadata about relationships (Tuesday, 21 February)
• metadata about relationships (Wednesday, 22 February)

Yoran Brondsema

• excerpt for BlogPosting (Monday, 27 February)

Ziarek, Nathan

• Re: One Book with many offers (was Re: Multiple "Products" per page, one product Title) - a tested solution (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: Multiple "Products" per page, one product Title (Friday, 24 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:54:33 UTC