W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > February 2012

RE: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions

From: Olson, Peter <polson@marvel.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:13:05 -0500
Message-ID: <BDB9E95AE966BA478050190597CC04AFBA525D@MASTER.MARVEL.NYC.ENT>
To: "Thad Guidry" <thadguidry@gmail.com>, <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Hey - 

Ok a nuts-and-bolts question.  I'm going to update the spec to remove some of the localized IDs in favor of doing the extension stuff you mentioned below.  Generally for an extended property (e.g.  <span itemprop="productID" itemtype="http://schema.org/productID" itemtype="http://schema.marvel.com/OurID">) does there need to be an actual page at the URL or does the URI just need to be unique?


-----Original Message-----
From: Thad Guidry [mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com]
Sent: Tue 2/21/2012 9:38 PM
To: public-vocabs@w3.org
Subject: Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions
> What qualifies as ubiquitous enough to be included as an identifier in a schema such as this one?  Is it better to include more (with fewer actually used) or fewer (but more frequently populated)?
> -       Peter
> Peter Olson | VP, Web and Application Development | Marvel Entertainment

I think it would be advantageous to allow as many productID's as
possible when the need arises.  Linked Data availability or not.

For example, perhaps just extending Schema.org productID to suit ? or
extending with Good Relations ?

<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Product">
  <span itemprop="productID" itemtype="http://schema.org/productID"


<meta itemprop='productID' content='OurID:123-444-321'/>

Interestingly, I did not find a "generic" productID while looking
through Good Relations other than a gr:BusinessEntity gr:owns a
gr:individual gr:ProductorService that has a gr:serialNumber as such

So perhaps internal productID's in the case of Comic Issues could also
use their own gr:serialNumber ??  But I think there is a need to not
mix the 2 notions of a productID and a serialNumber.  Forewarning :)


Nothing contained in this e-mail shall (a) be considered a legally binding agreement, amendment or modification of any agreement with Marvel, each of which requires a fully executed agreement to be received by Marvel or (b) be deemed approval of any product, packaging, advertising or promotion material, which may only come from Marvel's Legal Department.
Received on Sunday, 26 February 2012 22:13:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:22 UTC