W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Richer information in the microdata than in the visible content in the HTML page: what is the good practice ?

From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:08:12 -0600
Message-ID: <CAChbWaMY5ErxWkND=yhw4D41kEEt_t7dN_i3CPNg6vzt9qrQ-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-vocabs@w3.org
Can you list the video properties and user interactions your speaking of,
so we can take a look ?

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:23 AM, jean delahousse
<delahousse.jean@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have the following question :
>
> Working in a media with a video database, we have a lot of fine
> informations about the video : video properties,  user interactions,
> comments...
> In the HTML page, only a small subset of those informations will be
> visible to the reader.
> Should we publish all video information we have as microdata/schema.orgin the HTML page, even if they will be invisible for the reader ?
> What would be the impact on a SEO point of view : negative, neutral, still
> positive, when the microdata/schema.org description of an object is
> richer than the visible information.
>
> This question is about video, but also applies to persons, events...
>
> Regards
> Jean
>
> --
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +33 6 01 22 48 55, delahousse.jean@gmail.com, skype: jean.delahousse
> @jdelahousse, http://jean-delahousse.info
>
>
>


-- 
-Thad
http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry
Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 14:08:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 06:48:59 GMT