- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:44:52 +0100
- To: Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>
- Cc: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Henry Andrews <hha1@cornell.edu>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 29 February 2012 09:37, Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de> wrote: > Hi Martin, > I completely agree with your view. As I said before the only thing is what > it will happen when some content creators will not do this. > In addition, the same issue (indeed restricted to values following some > patterns) comes with multiple values in @itemprop attribute. > > Let me summarize: > Some people will do better markup as you suggest. By consequence two > triples will be created (corresponding to the two OS in the example). > Some people will not do this but rather by mistake they will annotate as I > suggested. In this case just one triple will be created? Yes; we should aim for the best, but not be suprised by the worst. In general introducing lots of little microsyntaxes would make for a mess. In practice, with a few properties it'll be hard to resist sometimes just throwing in a comma-separated value list instead of breaking things out into repeated markup elements. Dan
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 08:45:20 UTC