W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions

From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:38:39 -0600
Message-ID: <CAChbWaNUSKxNx55iRxb4jkyL7AnF4-B-AQEvn14HwnGBXqdDGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-vocabs@w3.org
>
> What qualifies as ubiquitous enough to be included as an identifier in a schema such as this one?  Is it better to include more (with fewer actually used) or fewer (but more frequently populated)?
>
> -       Peter
>
> Peter Olson | VP, Web and Application Development | Marvel Entertainment
>
>

I think it would be advantageous to allow as many productID's as
possible when the need arises.  Linked Data availability or not.

For example, perhaps just extending Schema.org productID to suit ? or
extending with Good Relations ?

<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Product">
  <span itemprop="productID" itemtype="http://schema.org/productID"
itemtype="http://ComicsForCheap.com/OurID">123-444-321</span>

or

<meta itemprop='productID' content='OurID:123-444-321'/>

Interestingly, I did not find a "generic" productID while looking
through Good Relations other than a gr:BusinessEntity gr:owns a
gr:individual gr:ProductorService that has a gr:serialNumber as such
http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1#serialNumber

So perhaps internal productID's in the case of Comic Issues could also
use their own gr:serialNumber ??  But I think there is a need to not
mix the 2 notions of a productID and a serialNumber.  Forewarning :)

--
-Thad
http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 02:39:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 06:48:59 GMT