- RE: Doubly revised extensibility proposal Jonathan Marsh (Tuesday, 28 May)
- RE: Doubly revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Thursday, 30 May)
- RE: Doubly revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Thursday, 30 May)
- RE: Doubly revised extensibility proposal Jonathan Marsh (Thursday, 30 May)
- RE: Doubly revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Thursday, 30 May)
- RE: Doubly revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Thursday, 30 May)
- RE: Doubly revised extensibility proposal Glen Daniels (Thursday, 30 May)
- RE: Doubly revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Thursday, 30 May)
- RE: Doubly revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Thursday, 30 May)
- RE: Doubly revised extensibility proposal Jonathan Marsh (Friday, 31 May)
Extensions Jeffrey Schlimmer (Thursday, 23 May)
- Re: Revised extensibility proposal Sanjiva Weerawarana (Tuesday, 21 May)
- RE: Revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Tuesday, 21 May)
- RE: Revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Tuesday, 21 May)
- RE: Revised extensibility proposal Jonathan Marsh (Tuesday, 21 May)
- RE: Revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Wednesday, 22 May)
- RE: Revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Wednesday, 22 May)
- RE: Revised extensibility proposal Jonathan Marsh (Wednesday, 22 May)
- RE: Revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Wednesday, 22 May)
- RE: Revised extensibility proposal Keith Ballinger (Thursday, 23 May)
- RE: Revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Thursday, 23 May)
- RE: Revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Thursday, 23 May)
- RE: Revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Thursday, 23 May)
- RE: Revised extensibility proposal Sedukhin, Igor (Thursday, 23 May)
- Re: Issue: should WSDL allow overloaded methods? Sanjiva Weerawarana (Tuesday, 14 May)
- Re: Issue: should WSDL allow overloaded methods? Jean-Jacques Moreau (Wednesday, 22 May)
- Re: Issue: should WSDL allow overloaded methods? Russell Butek (Wednesday, 22 May)
- Re: Issue: should WSDL allow overloaded methods? mario.jeckle@daimlerchrysler.com (Wednesday, 22 May)
- Re: Issue: should WSDL allow overloaded methods? Jochen.Ruetschlin@DaimlerChrysler.com (Thursday, 23 May)
- Re: Issue: should WSDL allow overloaded methods? Russell Butek (Thursday, 23 May)
- Re: Issue: should WSDL allow overloaded methods? Russell Butek (Thursday, 23 May)
- RE: Issue: should WSDL allow overloaded methods? Hurley, Oisin (Thursday, 23 May)
- RE: Issue: should WSDL allow overloaded methods? Keith Ballinger (Friday, 24 May)
- Re: issue: optional parts in <message>? Prasad Yendluri (Wednesday, 1 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Jeffrey Schlimmer (Wednesday, 1 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Jeffrey Schlimmer (Wednesday, 1 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Keith Ballinger (Wednesday, 1 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Grahame Grieve (Thursday, 2 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Jeffrey Schlimmer (Thursday, 2 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Jeffrey Schlimmer (Thursday, 2 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Keith Ballinger (Thursday, 2 May)
- Re: issue: optional parts in <message>? Sanjiva Weerawarana (Thursday, 2 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Jeffrey Schlimmer (Friday, 3 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Jeffrey Schlimmer (Friday, 3 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Jeffrey Schlimmer (Friday, 3 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Mike Deem (Saturday, 4 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Jeffrey Schlimmer (Friday, 3 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Mike Deem (Saturday, 4 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Mike Deem (Saturday, 4 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Mike Deem (Sunday, 5 May)
- Re: issue: optional parts in <message>? Sanjiva Weerawarana (Monday, 6 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Tom Jordahl (Monday, 6 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Mike Deem (Monday, 6 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Mike Deem (Tuesday, 7 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Jeffrey Schlimmer (Thursday, 9 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Jeffrey Schlimmer (Thursday, 9 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Jeffrey Schlimmer (Thursday, 9 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Jeffrey Schlimmer (Thursday, 9 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Mike Deem (Saturday, 11 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Mike Deem (Saturday, 11 May)
- Re: issue: optional parts in <message>? Bob Cunnings (Saturday, 11 May)
- RE: issue: optional parts in <message>? Jeffrey Schlimmer (Thursday, 16 May)
Last message date: Friday, 31 May 2002 19:40:30 UTC