- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 10:29:48 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Dial in information (members only): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002May/0024.html See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters. If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Agenda 1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is: Sandeep Kumar (fallback Mike McHugh, Jean-Jacques Moreau) 2. Approval of minutes [6]. 3. Review of Action items. ? 2002.04.18 Waqar Add new use case raised on the mailing list. ? 2002.04.18 Waqar will post by next Tuesday a draft. ? 2002.05.02 DavidB to get June F2F registration link working. ? 2002.05.09 The editors are asked to either add or dispose of each new issue listed above. Due 2002.05.16 ? 2002.05.09 Sanjiva will make the description of the <import> element clearer. Due 2002.05.16 ? 2002.05.09 Sanjiva will clarify the WSDL 1.1 text that described optional parts in bindings. Due 2002.05.16 ? 2002.05.09 Sanjiva will create new issue to eliminate <message>. Due 2002.05.16 ? 2002.05.09 Jonathan will reply to Mike Deem. Due 2002.05.16 Done 2002.05.09 Jonathan will post a note describing the AM task force, and will select a leader. Due 2002.05.16 4. Reminder to make arrangements for June FTF. Logistics page at [7]. Registration page is now available. 5. New issues: None. 6. Abstract Model Task Force composition. Invitation is at [16]. 7. Issues. Issue list at [9]. Latest draft of the spec at [8]. 7a. Issue: Optional parts in <message/> Thread starts at [17]. The resolution last week was to keep <message/>, and add a new issue on whether to eliminate <message/>. One proponent of this, Mike Deem, seems to have reversed his position. Do we have a champion for this issue? 7b. Issue: Open Content Model Igor proposes a few specific extensibility points in [22]. Roberto suggests a more comprehensive solution in [23]. 7c. Issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Response from WSFL, XLANG authors reported at [10]. Igor questions the assertion that we aren't going to tackle a full-blown event mechanism at [11]. Any other progress on this issue? 7d. Issue(s): Non-SOAP HTTP Binding Jeffrey refactored up the non-SOAP HTTP binding issues [12] and proposed a solution for some of them in [13], [14], and [15]. 7e. Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses? Thread starts at [18]. 7f. Issue: portType extensibility [28]. 7g. Issue: service type [29]. - Jonathan -------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/ [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/ [5] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-desc-charter [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/att-0128/01-5-09-minutes.html [7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/04/f2fJuneLogistics.html [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/att-0077/02-part1.html [9] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0181.html [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0187.html [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0182.html [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0183.html [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0204.html [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0009.html [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002May/0020.html [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0004.html [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0197.html [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0037.html [23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0095.html [28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0075.html [29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0076.html --------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2002 13:30:20 UTC