- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 10:29:48 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Dial in information (members only):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002May/0024.html
See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is:
Sandeep Kumar (fallback Mike McHugh, Jean-Jacques Moreau)
2. Approval of minutes [6].
3. Review of Action items.
? 2002.04.18 Waqar Add new use case raised on the mailing list.
? 2002.04.18 Waqar will post by next Tuesday a draft.
? 2002.05.02 DavidB to get June F2F registration link working.
? 2002.05.09 The editors are asked to either add or dispose of each new
issue listed above. Due 2002.05.16
? 2002.05.09 Sanjiva will make the description of the <import> element
clearer. Due 2002.05.16
? 2002.05.09 Sanjiva will clarify the WSDL 1.1 text that described
optional parts in bindings. Due 2002.05.16
? 2002.05.09 Sanjiva will create new issue to eliminate <message>. Due
2002.05.16
? 2002.05.09 Jonathan will reply to Mike Deem. Due 2002.05.16
Done 2002.05.09 Jonathan will post a note describing the AM task force, and
will select a leader. Due 2002.05.16
4. Reminder to make arrangements for June FTF. Logistics page at [7]. Registration page is now available.
5. New issues:
None.
6. Abstract Model Task Force composition. Invitation is at [16].
7. Issues. Issue list at [9]. Latest draft of the spec at [8].
7a. Issue: Optional parts in <message/>
Thread starts at [17]. The resolution last week was to keep <message/>, and add a new issue on whether to eliminate <message/>. One proponent of this, Mike Deem, seems to have reversed his position. Do we have a champion for this issue?
7b. Issue: Open Content Model
Igor proposes a few specific extensibility points in [22]. Roberto
suggests a more comprehensive solution in [23].
7c. Issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Response
from WSFL, XLANG authors reported at [10]. Igor questions the assertion
that we aren't going to tackle a full-blown event mechanism at [11].
Any other progress on this issue?
7d. Issue(s): Non-SOAP HTTP Binding
Jeffrey refactored up the non-SOAP HTTP binding issues [12] and proposed
a solution for some of them in [13], [14], and [15].
7e. Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses?
Thread starts at [18].
7f. Issue: portType extensibility [28].
7g. Issue: service type [29].
- Jonathan
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/
[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-desc-charter
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/att-0128/01-5-09-minutes.html
[7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/04/f2fJuneLogistics.html
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/att-0077/02-part1.html
[9] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0181.html
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0187.html
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0182.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0183.html
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0204.html
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0009.html
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002May/0020.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0004.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0197.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0037.html
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0095.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0075.html
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0076.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2002 13:30:20 UTC