- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 11:59:48 +0200
- To: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
- CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Jeff, I agree this ought be an easy issue. However [6] is in Last Call, and contains a pretty strong requirement that "W3C specifications [...] SHOULD use Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRI) [2] (or an appropriate subset thereof)." We seem to be (at least) some months away from Last Call ourselves, and I am wondering whether it is not more desirable to see how the landscape evolves and then make a more informed judgement. What do you think? Jean-Jacques. [6] http://www.w3.org/International/Group/charmod-edit/#sec-URIs Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote: > PROPOSAL > > Until IRIs are standardized, follow URI Escaping as outlined XML > Include. > > REFERENCES > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/cover.html > [2] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-00.txt > [3] ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2396.txt > [4] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2718.txt?number=2718 > [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/ > > EOF
Received on Monday, 6 May 2002 06:00:41 UTC