Agenda for 9 May 2002 WS Description WG

Dial in information (members only):
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002May/0009.html

See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters. 

If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda

1.  Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is:
      Sandeep Kumar (fallback Mike McHugh, Jean-Jacques Moreau)

2.  Approval of minutes [6], corrections at [6a].

3.  Review of Action items.

?    2002.04.04 Editors to get CVS requests to Philippe.
?    2002.04.18 Waqar Add new use case raised on the mailing list. 
?    2002.04.18 Waqar will post by next Tuesday a draft. 
?    2002.05.02 DavidB to get June F2F registration link working. 
DONE 2002.05.02 JM to send a message to Chris to have members of the
Desc 
                WG to join the Arch WG Usage Scenario task force. 

4.  Reminder to make arrangements for June FTF. Logistics page at [7].

5.  Usage Scenarios.  Any progress to report?  Arthur's comments at
[21].

6.  New issues:
- Issue: should WSDL allow overloaded methods? [24]
- Issue: WSDL must import schemas if types from them are used [25]
- Issue: soap:body binding description confusing when use is "literal"
[26]
- Conflicts of WSDL schemas [27]

7.  Issues.  Issue list at [8a]. New draft of the spec at [8].

7a. Issue: import/include
Sanjiva started the tread at [11].  Some support voiced for not doing
include.  No proposals for cleaning up import yet.  Sanjiva wonders
whether we need a proposal before closing the issue [20].

7b. Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses?
Thread starts at [18].  Is the discussion focused on addressing the
issue, clarifying the issue, or about a different issue?  I can't quite
tell 
whether this issue is being actively discussed or not :-).

7c. Issue: Optional parts in <message/>
Thread starts at [17].  The thread seems to split into several parts:
- Should message parts be optional?
- Should we get rid of message altogether?  If so, when? 
  - in WSDL 1.2?
  - in WSDL 2.0?
- Should we provide a simplified syntax for single-part messages?  See
[19].

7d. Issue: Open Content Model
Igor proposes a few specific extensibility points in [22].  Roberto
suggests a more comprehensive solution in [23].

7e. Issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Response
from WSFL, XLANG authors reported at [9].  Igor questions the assertion
that we aren't going to tackle a full-blown event mechanism at [10].
Any other progress on this issue?

7f. Issue(s): Non-SOAP HTTP Binding
Jeffrey refactored up the non-SOAP HTTP binding issues [12] and proposed
a solution for some of them in [13], [14], and [15].

7g. Issue: portType extensibility [28].

7h. Issue: service type [29].

- Jonathan

--------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/
[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-desc-charter
[6]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/att-0045/01-minu
tes-irc-02-05-02.htm
[6a] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0046.html
[7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/04/f2fJuneLogistics.html 
[8]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/att-0077/02-part
1.html
[8a]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0181.html
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0187.html
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0200.html
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0182.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0183.html
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0204.html
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0009.html 
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0205.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0004.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0197.html
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0093.html
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0074.html
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0041.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0037.html
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0095.html
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0072.html
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0100.html
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0098.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0102.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0075.html
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0076.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2002 18:41:02 UTC