Re: Issue: should WSDL allow overloaded methods?

Hi Joyce,

I added the following issue:

<issue id="issue-operation-overloading">
  <head>Should operation overloading be disallowed?</head>
  WSDL 1.1 allows overloaded operations- operations with the same
  name but different messages. If they are to be disallowed then
  we must require the operation name to be unique within a portType.
  <source>Joyce Yang</source>
</issue>

Bye,

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joyce Yang" <joyce.yang@oracle.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3c.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 4:37 AM
Subject: Issue: should WSDL allow overloaded methods?


> Issue: WSDL 1.1 is not clear about whether overloaded methods
> should be allowed or not. Therefore, more than one <operation>
> can have the same name in a <portType>, and each with different
> message parts. Do we want overloaded methods in WSDL?
> We should make a clear statement on this in WSDL 1.2.
> 
> Proposal: clearly disallow methods overloading in WSDL 1.2.
> Methods overloading should exist in the concrete implementation
> of the service, but not in the service description.
> 
> (Please add this issue to the issues list.)
> 
> Regards,
> Joyce
> 
> Joyce Yang
> Principal Member of Technical Staff
> Oracle Corp
> 650.506.5985
> joyce.yang@oracle.com

Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:47:51 UTC