- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 11:06:34 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Dial in information (members only):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002May/0037.html
See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is:
Sandeep Kumar (fallback Mike McHugh, Johan Pauhlsson)
2. Approval of minutes [6].
3. Review of Action items.
DONE [7] 2002.05.16 DBooth to find out how to get registration list.
DONE [8] 2002.05.16 Roberto to post revised extensibility proposal,
annotations out, revised extension.
4. Abstract Model TF. New member: Sandeep.
5. Usage Scenarios.
- Report from the Usage Scenarios Task Force (if any)
- Latest draft at [9].
- Should we publish?
6. FTF Agenda items
- Complete Requirements Document
- Abstract Model
- Publication schedule for the Spec
7. Issues. Issue list at [10]. Latest draft of the spec at [11].
New Issues:
- Jacek: Should I/O parameters be of the same type [12]
- Kevin: Names scope of top elements [13]
- Kevin: Uniqueness of WSDL names [13]
- Kevin: WSDL and Service versioning [14]
- Scott Hinkelman: Support for non-named-operation oriented portTypes
[15]
- [Editorial] SOAP Binding example [16]
- Sanjiva: Charset encoding [17]
- David: Operation terminology [18]
- JJM: Representing safe operations [19]
- Prasad: Can One-way operations return faults? [20]
7b. Issue: Open Content Model
Roberto's revised extensibility proposal at [21].
7a. Issue: Optional parts in <message/>
Thread starts at [22]. What is the status of this issue?
7c. Issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Any
proposals to better specify these ops? Should we have a straw poll on
whether to close the issue or wait for a proposal?
7d. Issue(s): Non-SOAP HTTP Binding
Jeffrey refactored up the non-SOAP HTTP binding issues [25] and proposed
a solution for some of them in [26], [27], and [28].
7e. Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses?
Thread starts at [29].
7f. Issue: portType extensibility [30].
7g. Issue: service type [31].
- Jonathan
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/
[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-desc-charter
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0151.html
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002May/0029.html
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0149.html
[9]
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/03/UC/wd-ws-desc-usecases-20020516.html
[10]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html
[11]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/att-0144/02-part
1.html
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0136.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0145.html
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0147.html
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0150.html
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0155.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0156.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0157.html
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0159.html
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0167.html
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0149.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0004.html
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0182.html
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0183.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0204.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0009.html
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0197.html
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0075.html
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0076.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 14:07:05 UTC