W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2002

Re: issue: optional parts in <message>?

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 09:12:36 +0600
Message-ID: <05c201c1f707$612cc400$07aa7cca@lankabook2>
To: "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>, "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com> writes:
> Just to be clear, are we thinking we aren't going to make _any_ changes
> that would break existing WSDL 1.1 documents? That's a pretty stiff
> constraint and can be used to "resolve" many of our open issues.
> --Jeff

Of course we are! We will make breaking changes, but I'm just very
concerned that *removing* message is not a 1.1 to 1.2 kind of change.

The approach Mike Deem suggested of augmenting message with the 
direction we intend to go in was much more reasonable IMO. I believe 
he's going to post a more complete proposal after looking at impact
on the bindings too. (Or that's what I asked that he do and he didn't
reply otherwise.)


Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2002 23:15:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:23 UTC