- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 11:14:09 +0200
- To: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
- CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org
I don't know if this is being put forward as a formal proposal, but I like the general direction this is going. Jean-Jacques. Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote: > A possible solution to this would be to allow one port type to > derive from another by extending the set of operations > supported. The description of the “extended tuner” would not > have to re-list the operations defined by the “basic tuner”, > but more importantly, the dual-tuner device could list just two > ports of type “extended tuner”, and down-level clients could > look at the derivation of the port type to recognize the “basic > tuner”. >
Received on Monday, 6 May 2002 05:14:50 UTC